It has released the first results under its**New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES)*, and approximately two-thirds of brands have passed their emissions targets as a result of an Australian Government report.
It has confirmed the average emissions for new light passenger vehicles beat the NVES target by 21 per cent.
Type 1 vehicles (passenger cars and SUVs) had a headline limit of 141g/km of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions for 2025, with Type 2 vehicles – including utes, vans, and large off-road SUVs like the Ford Everest – having a headline limit of 210g/km.
childcareman.xyz can save you thousands on a new car. Click
here
to get a great deal.
Overall, Type 1 vehicles had average emissions of 114g/km, while Type 2 vehicles had average emissions of 199g/km.
A year to 2029, headline CO2 limits for Type 1 and Type 2 vehicles will shrink each year so that car brands who met their target in 2025 may not be lucky in the world unless they continue to introduce low- or zero-emissions cars to offset their other vehicle.
A total of 40 ‘regulated entities’ – car manufacturers, suppliers or importers – beat their 2025 CO2 target and 19 didn’t.
Alfa Romeo (Aston Martin, Ferrari and General Motors), Honda – Hyundai KGM; JLR(JL) – Mahindra, Maserati Mazda/ Nissan tonesia or Porsche, Rolls-Royce, SAIC Maxus (better known as LDV).
The other brands in this list of brands that failed to meet their CO2 target are FCA USA LLC, one of four separate entries for automotive giant Stellantis; the others were Stellant Australia and New Zealand Pty Ltd, StellAntis Europe S. P An a A Stellantis Auto SAS, and .
Confusingly, Stellantis is one of several automakers that have their results split across multiple registered entities.
The government has released a list of approved bodies (including the number and type) of covered vehicles, their interim emissions value, units accrued and liabilities paid out. Similarly, if a brand has an interim emissions value above 0, this means penalties for the brand as it has gone beyond its target range.
The Register of Approved Vehicles (RAV) reported Mazda’ 38,465 vehicles; it incurred 508,517 liabilities the largest in any company — and more than twice the number as second-placed Nissan (215,261).
The other end of the spectrum was BYD Auto Co Ltd with 26,129 vehicles covered and an interim emissions value of -4,234,448 (115,504 cars, -2.890 in625) Tesla (131,907 vehicles; 2-2,212,093) and BNYDAuto Industry Company Limited (11,474 vehicles 2,048,530).
According to the government, there’s now a net surplus of 15 people. This means there is a market for trading NVES credits, with 9 million LVES units. The scheme allows a brand that isn’t meeting its targets to buy credits from another brand which is also on the list.
This helps for brands with high-emitting vehicles that want to avoid penalties, and for low- or zero emissions cars which are aiming to make a clean profit. These credits can also be used to offset liabilities in future years for Brands that have beaten their target as targets get tighter.
There were 620,947 vehicles on the RAV 71 per cent of these were Type 1 vehicles (and 29 Per cent) Type 2.
The NVES covers all new passenger and light commercial vehicles with a gross vehicle mass of up to 4.5 tonnes.
This is the first set of NVES results, and it’s the only reporting period that doesn’t cover a full calendar year. But that’s because the penalty component of the NVES only came into effect on July 1, 2025, even though the official EVES began on January 1, 2005.
s have two years to address their balance – if it’s more than zero – by “extinguishing” units against the interim emissions value of companies. But if they don’t, they’ll have a final emissions value greater than zero; this means that they may be issued with an infringement notice and in turn will face repercussions.
If a brand had an interim emissions value of more than zero in 2025, this means they’ll have to sell units with another company by December 31, 2027 or face ‘in February 2028 (50%) penalty multiplied by their final emissions values.
He said ‘These first NVES results show that cleaner vehicles and a competitive market can be hand in hand.’ Federal minister for Infrastructure, Transport (left), Regional Development of Local Government Catherine King, said the government was being held accountable for these findings.
“Australians continue to have a choice across a wide variety of vehicles.
“These results make it clear the NVES supports both lower emissions and consumer affordability.”
table from the NVES regulator website below, we’ve added the table to our. No company names are named, except for the removal of errant capitalisation.
| Regulated entity | Number of covered vehicles | Interim emissions value | Units accrued | Liabilities accrued |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| Alfa Romeo SpA | 62 | 2580 | 0 | 2580 |
| Aston Martin Lagonda Limited | 105 | 13,877 | 0 | 13,877 |
| Audi AG | 8050 | -21,780 | 21,780 | 0 |
| Automobili Lamborghini S.P.A. | 67 | -1594 | 1,594 | 0 |
| BMW Australia Ltd | 15,445 | -340,081 | 340,081 | 0 |
| Beiqi Foton Motor Co. Ltd. | 497 | -2941 | 2,941 | 0 |
| Bentham, Vincent Mark | 2 | 138 | 0 | 138 |
| Bentley Motors Limited | 81 | -1875 | 1,875 | 0 |
| BYD Auto Co Ltd | 26,129 | -4,234,294 | 4,234,294 | 0 |
| BYD Auto Industry Company Limited | 13,474 | -2,048,530 | 2,048,530 | 0 |
| Chery Automobile Co., Ltd | 30,829 | -438,633 | 438,633 | 0 |
| Chongqing Changan Automobile Co., Ltd. | 383 | -65,540 | 65,540 | 0 |
| Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor Co. LTD | 2 | -291 | 291 | 0 |
| Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche Aktiengesellschaft | 1653 | 33,448 | 0 | 33,448 |
| FCA USA LLC | 283 | 8194 | 0 | 8194 |
| Ferrari S.p.A. | 108 | 15,785 | 0 | 15,785 |
| Ford Motor Company | 355 | -1079 | 1079 | 0 |
| Ford Motor Company of Australia Pty Ltd | 38,541 | -426,261 | 426,261 | 0 |
| Ford Werke GmbH | 1169 | -24,559 | 24,559 | 0 |
| GAC International Co., Ltd. | 406 | -34,260 | 34,260 | 0 |
| General Motors Australia and New Zealand Pty Ltd | 1552 | 65,855 | 0 | 65,855 |
| Great Wall Motor Company Limited | 29,660 | -405,198 | 405,198 | 0 |
| Guangzhou Xiaopeng Motors Technology Co. Ltd | 1000 | -165,995 | 165,995 | 0 |
| Honda Motor Company Limited | 9022 | 26,069 | 0 | 26,069 |
| Hyundai Motor Company | 39,863 | 84,563 | 0 | 84,563 |
| Isuzu Motors Limited | 29,825 | -365,080 | 365,080 | 0 |
| JAC Motors | 252 | -2185 | 2185 | 0 |
| Jaguar Land Rover Australia Pty Ltd | 3355 | 16,666 | 0 | 16,666 |
| Jaguar Land Rover Limited | 25 | 1819 | 0 | 1,819 |
| KG Mobility Corp. | 1969 | 22,344 | 0 | 22,344 |
| Kia Motors Corporation | 51,732 | -729,698 | 729,698 | 0 |
| Mahindra Automotive Australia Pty Ltd | 2757 | 32,938 | 0 | 32,938 |
| Maserati S.P.A. | 96 | 4496 | 0 | 4496 |
| Mazda Motor Corporation | 38,465 | 508,517 | 0 | 508,517 |
| McLaren Automotive Ltd | 21 | -416 | 416 | 0 |
| Mercedes-Benz Australia/Pacific Pty Ltd | 11,494 | -133,730 | 133,730 | 0 |
| Mitsubishi Motors Australia Limited | 35,002 | -82,072 | 82,072 | 0 |
| Nissan Motor Co. (Australia) Pty Ltd | 13,877 | 215,261 | 0 | 215,261 |
| Polestar Performance AB | 1639 | -281,410 | 281,410 | 0 |
| Renault s.a.s | 903 | -16,310 | 16,310 | 0 |
| Rolls-Royce Motor Cars Limited | 34 | 4497 | 0 | 4497 |
| SAIC Maxus Automotive Co., Ltd | 5519 | 21,129 | 0 | 21,129 |
| SAIC Motor Corporation Limited | 26,991 | -377,601 | 377,601 | 0 |
| SEAT, S.A. | 823 | -67,733 | 67,733 | 0 |
| Shandong Tangjun Ouling Automobile Manufacture Co., Ltd. | 46 | -9837 | 9837 | 0 |
| Skoda Auto a.s. | 2914 | -86,888 | 86,888 | 0 |
| Smart Automobile Co., Ltd. | 2 | -303 | 303 | 0 |
| Stellantis (Australia and New Zealand) | 336 | -50,466 | 50,466 | 0 |
| Stellantis Auto SAS | 681 | -23,730 | 23,730 | 0 |
| Stellantis Europe S.P.A | 158 | -9615 | 9615 | 0 |
| Subaru Corporation | 13,187 | 139,635 | 0 | 139,635 |
| Suzuki Motor Corporation | 5042 | -64,204 | 64,204 | 0 |
| Tesla, Inc. | 13,907 | -2,212,093 | 2,212,093 | 0 |
| Toyota Motor Company Australia Limited | 115,504 | -2,890,625 | 2,890,625 | 0 |
| Volkswagen AG | 15,876 | -510,249 | 510,249 | 0 |
| Volvo Car Corporation | 3643 | -158,781 | 158,781 | 0 |
| Wuhan Lotus Cars Co., Ltd. | 1 | -173 | 173 | 0 |
| Zheijiang Zeekr Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd | 1503 | -259,440 | 259,440 | 0 |
| Zhejiang Geely Automobile Co., Ltd. | 4630 | -620,233 | 620,233 | 0 |
| TOTAL | 620,947 | -15,942,972 | 17,165,783 | 1,222,811 |
Companies submit their vehicles’ CO2 emissions and mass in running order – the weight of the vehicle, all fluids, standard equipment and a 75kg driver – onto the RAV before they pass an approved road car to the Australian market for the first time.
In a statement that there has been an increase in low- and zero-emissions vehicles across Australia, the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI), which is Australian’s leading body for car brands, said sales growth “has just increased marginally” but only slightly higher.
It argues maintaining compliance amid tightening targets would require “materially stronger uptake of EVs than current market trends indicate”.
The biggest concern, however, is that an increase in EVs on Australian roads will be crucial to achieve the ambitious Government targets which reduce each year to 2029.’ FCAI chief executive Tony Weber said in statement last week ‘This is one of the most important things we care about because it means more people are getting rid of their strictest Government plans and they have been reduced every year at least by 20%”.
The best thing they can do is increase in the supply of zero and low emissions vehicles that car makers are currently supplying,’ said. But the long-term success of the NVES depends on more demand for EVs, though it is not always that way. Demand for EVs is still subdued at this point and it’s one of the biggest concerns and disappointment that car makers are facing right now.
The Government is keen on examining policy settings that support consumer demand for EVs and low-emission vehicles, which will help achieve the NVES,’ said FCAI. Paraphrasingr ’It is.
The NVES results have led to an increase in the number of low- and zero-emissions vehicles in Australia, but warned against pushback from legacy brands by Polestar Australia managing director Scott Maynard, who only sells EVs.
However, Mr Maynard said in a statement ‘The fact that two-thirds of manufacturers beat their emissions targets is the proof these regulations can be achieved.’ The Australian car industry claims to go against some corners are at risk and it was not possible for them to do so from outside Australia’s own industries.
But as consultation on the next stage of NVES begins, it’s important that Australians don’t take any part in scaremongering from legacy brands to keep our country safe and convenient place for old technology.
But as we move forward towards Australia’s long-term emissions reduction targets, “NVES (National Energy and Environmental Protection) target for NVE), along with incentives like the FBT exemption for electric vehicles, remain important.” Paraphrasing ‘It is an important part of my life to be paraphrased.
MORE:
What the first federal emission standard means for Aussie car buyers
Thanks for reading Almost 20 auto brands missed CO2 targets in Australian Governments first NVES results
